Apr 9, 2008

Horses suffer when rescues full, no takers on free horses

Horse owners feel pain of rising supply prices [link]

Lindsey Henley | April 9, 2008

Peaches is the newest addition to the Roanoke Valley Horse Rescue (RVHR).

While there’s no question she’s cute, the Horse Rescue – already with more than 50 horses – is running out of room.

The problem is more and more people want to give up their horses.

“I usually get at least one call a day and three or four emails a day of people looking to place their animals with us,” said Patricia Muncy with RVHR. “It’s just a sad situation.”

It’s a situation Muncy mostly blames on the rising cost of things like hay and grain.

“The hay is the biggest thing right now. It’s causing a lot of problems for owners,” she said.

In some places, the price has gone from $2.50 per square bale, to as high as $10.00 per square bale. Those high prices are leading to malnourished and abandoned horses.

Even worse, some owners are having to euthanize their horses, because they simply can’t afford to take care of them.

“It’s just turning into a very vicious circle for everybody,” Muncy said.

We checked with the Roanoke Valley Equine Clinic today. They’ve been receiving a lot of calls from people who are trying to place horses with them, because the horses’ owners can no longer afford them.

When it comes to euthanizing an animal, it is the owner’s decision. Veterinarians at the Roanoke Valley Equine Clinic have been doing everything they can to try to intervene, and find the horse a home.

XP—Who predicted this would happen?

Desperate measures

Officals Search For Person Who Dumped Horse [link]

Jim Konkoly | April 9, 2008

SEBRING – An old horse that was dumped out of a trailer near Lake Placid is being cared for by Highlands County Animal Control.

Darryl Scott, director of the county agency, has posted the horse's picture on the Animal Control Web site, in the "lost and found" link, in hopes of identifying the person who abandoned the horse.

On March 20, after 10 p.m., a person living on County Road 29 near Lake Placid, called Animal Control and reported that a horse had been abandoned near his residence.

Scott said the caller reported the following:

He heard a truck stop on the road, then heard the sound of a trailer gate opening. Moments later he heard the trailer gate slammed shut, then heard the truck drive off. The resident then saw a horse in his front yard and called Animal Control.

Scott said the horse was in "poor" condition and, from the caller's account, obviously was abandoned in the road.

XP—Such a desperate measure. What else can you do if your financial situation changes and you cannot afford to feed your horse or euthanize it?

Apr 5, 2008

Horse rescues overwhelmed with requests

Burden falls on horse sanctuary [link]

Janet O’Neill | April 5, 2008

Owners give up animals as costs run high in weak economy

COTTONWOOD -- America’s dreary economy is claiming a passel of four-legged, shaggy-tailed victims.

Linda Richards, owner of Safe Haven Horse Rescue and Sanctuary on West Anderson Drive, is getting calls every day from people who just can’t afford to keep their equine companions. The current horse population on her 25-acre spread is “way too many,” she said.

Translated, that number is something in the neighborhood of 40.

“We are overwhelmed right now,” Richards said Thursday. “We’re looking for serious foster homes. It’s the economy.”

Recently, she took in a horse from an elderly couple because the husband was suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. She was more than happy to save it from being euthanized. But other stories are starting to repeat.

“People are losing their homes,” Richards said. “They’ve lost their jobs. It’s the cost of living.”

And the cost of owning a horse is going up with everything else.

A bale of hay costs between $15 and $18, Richards said, an expense she calls “outrageous” and the highest she’s seen. A horse can devour that in a week.

It follows that Safe Haven’s expenses are up along with everyone else’s. The sanctuary goes through 2 tons of alfalfa hay a week—that doesn’t include the special mush some of the animals require—and at $240 a pop, it adds up.

Horse lovers like Lisa Lashaway, who lives outside Los Angeles, are trying to help. She sponsors an Arabian mare named Beauty at Safe Haven for a tax-deductible $65 a month. She also volunteers for the nonprofit sanctuary.

“A lot of horses that would be going to slaughter are saved,” Lashaway said of the sanctuary.

In addition to donations, Safe Haven relies heavily on an annual fundraiser to keep afloat. Its Spring Playday is scheduled for April 13 at Bobby Jones Arena in Cottonwood.

Also entertaining for spectators, it’s open to riders of all levels of experience who compete for prizes. Among the eight events are barrel racing, pole bending and other gymkhana-type contests. Food, raffle tickets and Safe Haven merchandise will be available for sale.

Richards hopes to hold two play days this year, as opposed to last year’s one, so she can continue to care for abused and orphaned horses until new homes are found. She says one thoroughbred who went from 700 to 1,000 pounds in her care is typical of the rewards of her work.

“She’s healthy; she’s happy,” Richards said. “We adopt out a lot of good horses.”

XP—What is "happy to save it from being euthanized" about anyway? I thought chemical euthanasia was the great and wise solution to the problem? (Sorry, I don't agree with that wasteful and environmentally unfriendly option.)

Apr 4, 2008

Sadly, ban opponents predictions coming true

Activists fight horse exports to Mexico [link]

Mateusz Perkowski | April 4, 2008

As slaughter drops off in U.S., attention shifts to live exports

A "puntilla" boning knife stabs the horse in the back of the neck, severing the spinal cord.

Rendered immobile, the animal nonetheless remains conscious as it's hung by its hind legs and its throat is slit.

"It's an older, more barbaric practice" that is probably common in Mexico, said Keith Dane, director of equine protection for the Humane Society of the United States.

These methods were filmed by an investigator in a Mexican horse slaughterhouse, and the group is now using the footage to gain support for a federal ban on slaughtering horses or exporting them for slaughter.

"We're very confident we've got the votes," Dane said, referring to the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act currently before the House and Senate.

The irony is that more horses are now being shipped to Mexico as the result of horse slaughter bans in several U.S. states, said Tom Lenz, a veterinarian, past president of the American Association of Equine Practitioners and chair of the Unwanted Horse Coalition.

"What's going on today is exactly what we predicted," he said.

Horse slaughter isn't banned at the federal level, but bans in Illinois and Texas effectively shut down the last three remaining plants in the U.S. last year. Since then, exports of horses for slaughter have surged, Lenz said.

About 10,900 horses have been sent to Mexico for slaughter so far in 2008, up from about 4,900 at the time last year—more than a twofold increase, according to the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service.

"Once they cross the border, they're no longer under our federal veterinary supervision," said Lenz.

That is exactly why the Humane Society wants Congress to pass the federal ban, said Dane. Since there are no horse slaughterhouses left in the U.S., passing the act would not change the situation in this country, he said.

"The only real impact of the bill is to stop the export," said Dane. "The ban is the answer."

Groups that oppose the bill, including the AAEP and the American Veterinary Medical Association, may be counting on new horse slaughter facilities starting up in states with no horse slaughter ban, he said.

However, this isn't likely to happen even if the federal ban fails in Congress, he said. The ire such plants would draw from the society and other animal rights groups would scare investors away, Dane said.

"It's probably not a wise business move to open another one in another state," he said.

The AVMA is not "pro-slaughter," but the association also doesn't believe slaughter bans are realistic, said Angela Demaree, a veterinarian and assistant director of governmental relations for the group.

"There's no quick fix to the problem," she said.

Just because the Congress prohibits horse exports for slaughter doesn't mean the animals will cease traveling to Mexico, Demaree said. There's a possibility that horses sent to that country supposedly for breeding or showing will actually be processed for meat, she said.

"The point is nobody has looked into exports under false premises," said Demaree.

Export statistics cause Demaree to suspect this may already be happening. At 1,100 horses, the number of animals sent to Mexico for breeding so far in 2008 is 10 times greater than at this point last year, according to AMS.

"Our concern is, if the bill passes, we could see those numbers escalate even further," said Demaree.

Proponents of the bill discount this argument, since existing rules could be subverted as well, said Dane.

"There's always the possibility that someone will lie and break the laws," he said. "That happens every day on multiple levels."

Federal oversight would need to be stepped up to reduce the prevalence of sham horse exports, Dane said. The society would also launch investigations to ensure the law was enforced, he said.

What troubles veterinary groups like the AAEP and AVMA is that the bill doesn't provide any funding for the care of unwanted horses, said Lenz.

Owners of the 100,000 or so horses that are usually slaughtered each year would need to seek out other options, he said.

Wealthy horse owners can afford the $60 to $100 it costs to euthanize a horse and the $200 to $300 more it costs to dispose of the carcass, he said. For poorer owners, selling the animal for slaughter is often the only financially feasible choice, said Lenz.

"There's a lot of people at the lower end of the horse business that are having a tough time right now," said Lenz, noting that the high cost of hay, feed and fuel aggravates the problem.

"Those are the people who are on the borderline economically," he said.

With so many unwanted horses, Lenz worries that the animals would be neglected, abandoned or abused.

Such concerns are not backed up by the facts, according to Veterinarians for Equine Welfare, a group opposing horse slaughter. The horse slaughter industry depends mostly on healthy animals, not old or sickly ones that need to be euthanized, the group said in a white paper earlier this year.

"No increase in the abandonment or neglect of horses has been documented since the closure of the three domestic slaughter plants in the earlier part of 2007," stated the paper.

It is true that many horses headed for slaughter are outwardly healthy, but many have temperamental problems or become lame only when subjected to weight, Lenz said. Otherwise, it wouldn't make economic sense for owners to sell them for slaughter, given the much lower selling price for meat horses, he said.

"Nobody is raising horses in this country to be processed. ... These are just discarded horses," said Lenz. "If there were no longer horses being discarded, there would be no horse slaughter in this country."

XP—You won't stop the export of horses for slaughter by criminalizing it, you'll drive the market underground, but as long as there is still a demand for horsemeat, there WILL be slaughter. We were better off when we could control the conditions here in the U.S. and had government oversight—it was a more humane end for unwanted horses than what the ban has created.